The recent affirmative action ruling by the US Supreme Court is poised to have a profound impact on college applications. The decision, which upheld the ability of universities to consider race as a factor in their admissions process, has ignited intense debate among scholars, activists, and students alike. Proponents argue that affirmative action is essential to promote diversity and address historical disadvantages faced by minority groups. They believe this ruling will enable institutions to create a more inclusive and tolerant environment on campuses across the nation. However, critics contend that the decision only perpetuates discrimination and unfairly favors some students over others. With college admissions becoming increasingly competitive, this ruling adds another layer of complexity to the already complex process, leaving countless applicants wondering how it will affect their chances of acceptance. It remains to be seen how universities will navigate this ruling and strike a delicate balance between promoting diversity and adhering to the principles of equality and fairness..
Moonpreneur
July 19, 2023
,
Education
The United States Supreme Court ruled against implementing affirmative action in college admissions, ruling that race cannot be a consideration and compelling universities to search for alternative approaches to achieving diverse student bodies.
After permitting American institutions to take race into limited consideration in admissions for forty-five years, Chief Justice John Roberts said on the 29th of June that American universities have far too long “concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.”
According to the court’s majority opinion, the school’s affirmative action programs “unavoidably negatively employ race, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful endpoints.”
The outcome of the case Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard was on the expected lines as Affirmative Action at American Colleges, especially the University of California and the University of Texas, has been a matter of heated debate for years. Politics aside, the ruling, however, now more than ever, begs the question of the scenario for future applications at these colleges.
What does the data say?
Let’s keep the politics aside and let the data speak for itself; in a recent Pew Research Center survey, only one-third of American citizens (33%) approved of selective universities using race and ethnicity in admissions choices, compared to the majority half who disapproved. A previous BestColleges survey showed that most students (59%) and college students’ social experiences (62%) agree that racial and cultural diversity enhances the learning environment. However, only 37% of students favor considering race and ethnicity to determine college admittance. The same report also pointed out that affirmative action is opposed by 33% of Black respondents, while 38% of them support it.
The recent ruling by a six-justice conservative supermajority declared that Harvard and the University of North Carolina had violated the 14th Amendment of the Constitution by considering students’ race as one of several factors in their admissions process. The writing on the wall became pretty straightforward, especially for most elite institutions in the country, as they will need to develop alternative strategies to attain diversity goals.
Recommended Reading: HOW TO CHOOSE A COLLEGE ADMISSIONS COUNSELOR IN 2023
It’s just another day for most colleges and universities
In the United States, there are roughly 4,000 colleges and universities, but only less than 200 of them have highly selective admissions policies, meaning fewer than 50% of applicants are accepted. There are just over 200 colleges where the decision about a race-conscious admissions procedure may significantly impact.
Georgetown University researchers conducted simulations in March to assess the potential consequences of eliminating race as a factor in college admissions. Their findings revealed that a nationwide ban would likely reduce ethnic diversity among students attending selective colleges. However, they also emphasized that a comprehensive overhaul of the college admissions system would be necessary for a sustainable solution. This overhaul would eliminate practices such as legacy admissions and athletic recruitment, among other measures.
What about the legacy admissions?
The Supreme Court’s decision to reject race-based affirmative action in college admissions has increased pressure on renowned colleges and universities to drop another preference that is now much more difficult to defend: a benefit for candidates whose mother or father attended the institution.
The so-called “legacy” benefit is coming under fire from the White House, Capitol Hill, and regular Americans who perceive it as an unjust benefit that favors the wealthy and White applicants over the poor and applicants of color since it is inherited. Affirmative action is no longer defendable if it does not counterbalance the practice.
The legacy admissions at institutions like Harward will also take a hit due to the passed verdict. Democrats and Republicans have called for eliminating legacy admissions since the Supreme Court declared colleges and universities cannot consider race a criterion for admission.
Wrapping Up!!
One should never give up on the dream of getting into an Ivy League School!! If you are confident in your potential and skills, work hard to achieve the goal!!
Overall the picture is not grim at all. The Affirmative Action Ruling truly affects only a few chosen colleges and universities, which leaves plenty of options for your brilliant young mind to search and apply to several colleges which provide an equally promising future!!
9valheimis on a mission to educate and ignite the flames of entrepreneurship through our holistically created online STEM programs, which will help kids master the futuristic sciences such as Robotics, Game Development, App Development, Advanced Math, and much more!!
Register for a free 60-minuterobotics and Coding workshop today!
Share this post
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against implementing affirmative action in college admissions, stating that race cannot be a consideration and universities must find alternative approaches to promoting diversity. The decision came after forty-five years of allowing American institutions to consider race in admissions. The ruling raises questions about the future application process at colleges like Harvard and the University of Texas, which have been the subject of ongoing debates about affirmative action. Data shows that only one-third of Americans approve of selective universities using race in admissions decisions. The ruling also puts pressure on colleges to reconsider legacy admissions, which give preference to candidates with parents who attended the institution.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.